REM
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2023
- Threads
- 13
- Messages
- 3,268
- Reaction score
- 5,904
- Location
- NC
- Vehicles
- 2020 Model 3 Standard Range++ & Diet Cybertruck, Dual Motor
- Occupation
- Professional Retard
I'm getting pretty tired of proving you wrong from a 1 minute google search, so I'll just leave this here:Incorrect again. Tesla has never received a federal mandate for any feature other than through recalls, and each of those was initiated by Tesla itself. There is no set of Federal regulations associated with AP or FSD. There have been a few Federal inquiries and requests for more information, to which Tesla has responded, but there has never been a feature change due to Federal action. Tesla added nag in early 2016 exclusively and directly as a result of idiots posting videos of Teslas without drivers in the front left seat. They were using AP, a feature that was advertised and contracted for with buyers by Tesla as included in the CT, but which is now abandoned.
We can speculate that the reason Tesla gave up on AP for CT is resource leveling and the low take rate for the truck no longer justifying the commitment, but it was a legally enforceable obligation. It is also a moral obligation. There were things that Tesla could have done to hedge this commitment, but did not do. For example, there was no need to include it at all in the feature set listed in sales and contractual language, instead focusing on the superior FSD feature set. This may have been an oversight, but it does put them in a box because of the few folks who cling to AP and prefer not to pay for FSD.
One way for Tesla to shunt the issue entirely is seen in their first step to evade this obligation - provide free FSD. They have now done this for every CT for an added year beyond the trial period. The next stop would be to define FSD as fully incorporating the AP feature set, which it essentially already does. The final step would be to rename FSD as FSD/AP or something similar and say âmission accomplishedâ. The problem with this is the future FSD revenue stream to Tesla. Perhaps the CT will remain a niche vehicle and that revenue loss wonât be material, so every truck sold going forward will simply include FSD.
Itâs pretty clear that not including some sort of AP/cruise control as a base feature is a nonstarter for even the lowest price CT. Thereâs no $60k vehicle sold by any manufacturer without some sort of AP-like cruise control.
https://www.automotivedive.com/news...a result of those,, serious injury or death.â
Not going to even bother commenting or reading further, might as well be talking to a brick wall. You are a naysayer with nothing better to do than just be a contrarian; ignoring plain truth.
Sponsored