Report your FSD v14 update

[Galvatron]

It's going to be weeks... minimum. Best bet is probably to follow Chuck on x tbh. Ashok originally said a few weeks ago that CT would be EOM (OCT) but deleted that response within the past couple of days. My guess is mid to end of Nov for us.

 

[seussiii]

Yea, weird, It did show as if it was deleted. Multiple people referenced the post and even screenshotted it. Either way, we probably aren't getting it in the next 10 days. Expect it end of next month and its a bonus if earlier.

 

[Coagulation]

We’ll end up with 14.2 in a few weeks. Better off

 

[hemiarch]

We’ll end up with 14.2 in a few weeks. Better off

I like your attitude.

 

[ABILISK]

Selfishly I want the FSD team to work hard getting CT up to par, but looking at the big picture, it’s far more important to get unsupervised done on the sexy cars. CT will follow in its own good time.

 

[hemiarch]

Selfishly I want the FSD team to work hard getting CT up to par, but looking at the big picture, it’s far more important to get unsupervised done on the sexy cars. CT will follow in its own good time.

Pains me to say this but 3 and y first. Neither of my cars

 

[ABILISK]

Pains me to say this but 3 and y first. Neither of my cars

The code must be nearly identical for S and X. Even if minor tweaks need to be made, it won’t be long after 3 and Y get it. Plus there’s sooo many of those running around that they’ll gather data super fast.

Then there’s CT - a mysterious outlier that’s far superior, but is slow to adapt to its new environment. Like a super hero landing on earth for the first time.

 

[OldDirtyRobot]

Seeing as the original tweet about the CT getting V14 in later October has been deleted, I wouldn't hold my breath.

 

[HaulingAss]

Yea, weird, It did show as if it was deleted. Multiple people referenced the post and even screenshotted it. Either way, we probably aren't getting it in the next 10 days. Expect it end of next month and its a bonus if earlier.

You must be new to how fake news is created. A screenshot is proof only to highly gullible people.

The Tesla haters can't stand how well Tesla is doing. In the middle of the Tesla fire bombings and other vandalism, they actually thought they had won, they are so deluded, they thought Tesla was going down! It was a short-lived celebration.

They don't know Elon very well, he never throws in the towel, never gives up, unless he sees it's actually for the better if he changes course.

 

[seussiii]

You must be new to how fake news is created. A screenshot is proof only to highly gullible people.

That's why I literally said in my post that they referenced the post AND there were screenshots. You could literally see that it was gone from the original post. I know both Chuck and Farzad referenced it and I checked it myself for exactly that reason.

The people that noticed it at the time were not TSLA doomers. Either way, We aren't getting it EOM.

 

[Jhodgesatmb]

We’ll end up with 14.2 in a few weeks. Better off

It probably is better to be on a point release after 14.2.0 comes out, but then again we will probably have our own point releases. Too many changes. Anyway, who is to say they will give us everything all at once?

 

[Jhodgesatmb]

The code must be nearly identical for S and X. Even if minor tweaks need to be made, it won’t be long after 3 and Y get it. Plus there’s sooo many of those running around that they’ll gather data super fast.

Then there’s CT - a mysterious outlier that’s far superior, but is slow to adapt to its new environment. Like a super hero landing on earth for the first time.

They already had/have solid controllers for the other SX3Y cars.

 

[REM]

We’ll end up with 14.2 in a few weeks. Better off

This is a good take. I agree.

 

[Fvansan]

It's going to be weeks... minimum. Best bet is probably to follow Chuck on x tbh. Ashok originally said a few weeks ago that CT would be EOM (OCT) but deleted that response within the past couple of days. My guess is mid to end of Nov for us.

Two Weeks!

 

[REM]

I like your attitude.

Technical Analyst: Both the Optimist and Pessimist are either incorrect or rounding their statement to a nominal figure; as the contents of the liquid would need to appear higher than the 50% mark along the height axes of the glass, considering that the volume of space increases as you observe towards the top of the glass since it widens at the mouth.

To have a more precise calculation, they would need to say it is either 42% full or 58% empty.