Breezer Rear Window Replacement System for camping / sleeping in bed! 💨 Pumps cabin air into bed vault

[yippie]

~900

Portable Heat Pump is cheaper and better solution, this is a disaster.

 

[flamaest]

Portable Heat Pump is cheaper and better solution, this is a disaster.

bro, no is forcing you to buy this solution.

other folks want this and are happy with the design.

 

[CybertruckRN1127]

Where can I get this installed at?

 

[flamaest]

Where can I get this installed at?

Most car glass insulation places should be able to help you, but if not, the company that sells this device is partnering with a few glass installation companies across the nation.

 

[yippie]

bro, no is forcing you to buy this solution.

other folks want this and are happy with the design.

true, there is always people who will buy anything. feel free to skip past my comment, the point remains.

 

[Michael S]

Great news, Breezer windows just finished designing their removable rear window system so that you can sleep in the bed of the truck in comfort.

https://breezerwindows.com/product/tesla/

The special thing about this design is that it can be purchased with a hose setup to push 2nd-row air conditioning into the bed while the truck is in camp mode.

This is an awesome solution for camping and it will go well with the systems I have next to put into the cyber truck, like a bed, refrigerator, microwave, tools, and accessories.

Below are the latest design photographs and I will be adding to these images with more photos and videos as soon as I get mine installed.

I plan on crossing the country with my Cybertruck with this design in 2025.

Nice work. Nobody has explained why the manufacturer of a vehicle costing over $100,000. hasn’t factory installed a device to accomplish this.

 

[RM Rilke]

Nice work. Nobody has explained why the manufacturer of a vehicle costing over $100,000. hasn’t factory installed a device to accomplish this.

As a career lawyer, I thank you in advance.

 

[Crissa]

Nice work. Nobody has explained why the manufacturer of a vehicle costing over $100,000. hasn’t factory installed a device to accomplish this.

The vehicle doesn't cost over $100k, and why does the manufacturer have to make all the options?

-Crissa

 

[bosshog]

The vehicle cost 150 000 in Canada . I dont expect the manufacturer to do anything except give me a vehicle that doesnt leak in very light rain .

 

[Jedi2155]

true, there is always people who will buy anything. feel free to skip past my comment, the point remains.

I considered the portable option, but the main benefit of this option over the portable is that I don't have to carry a portable unit to do the same function of something built into the car already.

 

[Chris9702L]

Hey guys, the truck is mine. A couple observations:
- the holes don’t really take away much visibility from seeing out the back when using the mirror (vault cover open)
- it’s about $100 at a local auto glass place. It’s installed like a normal window. Takes about an hour to install.
- don’t think a slider would work. The slider would allow to much noise. Believe me, riding around without the window in is loud ? The Breezer has a thick seal which makes it as quiet as the normal window was.
- initial thoughts - I give it a ?. Can’t wait to use it truck camping.

 

[Nolacyber]

How much were you going to see out the window anyway?

I just want it for the fresh air and managing the pressure differential.

-Crissa

Obstructs the view out the rear window. LOL. There is a view?

 

[scottf200]

I'm another vote for the opening rear window, especially if automatic.

People are not understanding the liability issue of a tonneau cover hitting a human body parts (fingers, arm, etc) / pet part (tails, paw, etc) as it opens and passes THRU/BY the rear windows. This seems like such an obvious liability that is blown off.

 

[DoberManPin-Sure]

People are not understanding the liability issue of a tonneau cover hitting a human body parts (fingers, arm, etc) / pet part (tails, paw, etc) as it opens and passes THRU/BY the rear windows. This seems like such an obvious liability that is blown off.

Like anything auto-related, it's not risk free--windows, sunroof, FSD, etc. I'm in-house counsel for a publicly traded company with one of my main tasks being detecting and avoiding unnecessary risks. This one would be low on my list . . . especially with some built-in safety mechanisms that may exist (e.g., it stop closing when it hits an object lightly; perhaps it does or could stop opening, too).

So, far from "not understanding" and/or blowing off the risk, I've actually considered it and would accept it as an owner. I'm not dismissing your point about a risk; rather, I'm just disagreeing with the degree of exposure and your assessment that those of us in favor of the option haven't considered the risk.

Happy holidays!

 

[Crissa]

So, far from "not understanding" and/or blowing off the risk, I've actually considered it and would accept it as an owner. I'm not dismissing your point about a risk; rather, I'm just disagreeing with the degree of exposure and your assessment that those of us in favor of the option haven't considered the risk.

NHTSA has already mitigated the risk, not to mention basic liability as you said... so I honestly don't know why this argument comes up repeatedly.

-Crissa