• Welcome to Tesla Roadster Forum! If you're joining us from Cybertruckownersclub.com, then you may already have an account here.

    If you were registered on the Cybertruck forum as of September 18, 2026 or earlier, then you can login here with the same username and password.

    If you wish, you can remove your account here.

Wolverine on mod Y basis’ [rendered]

Fran

Member
First Name
Fran
Joined
Apr 8, 2020
Threads
1
Messages
13
Reaction score
15
Location
Spain
Vehicles
BMW X3, RAV4, Erjee 250gt swb
Country flag
A new idea; build the Wolverine on the basis of the model Y. You’ll probably have seen this going around now.
I don’t like the rounded design….nothing new and not catching. But maybe it is feasible to use the model Y’s structure to save some money?
Tesla Roadster 2nd gen Wolverine on mod Y basis’ [rendered] 97A00103-1EE0-4753-A225-C6E4170C69EC
 

firsttruck

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 25, 2020
Threads
202
Messages
2,587
Reaction score
1,708
Location
mx
Vehicles
none
Country flag
seems like it would be easier to just scale down the CT unibody no?
If you scale down you would need all new designs and more machines/tools for front casting, rear casting, structural battery pack. Have to keep inventory of more different parts. Lower economy of scale cost effects.

Possible huge cost saving on factory machines/tools if used Model Y chassis. The problem is Model Y might be too lightweight for a truck.

Model X is another interesting probability. Right now Model X does not have front casting, rear casting, structural battery pack because the current production is too low (50K - 100K) to justify high cost of expensive high volume IRDA gigapress casting machine.

If Cybertruck Wolverine edition was based on a 3rd generation Model X they could share front casting, structural battery pack. Mostly outer body and rear casting would be different.
 

firsttruck

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 25, 2020
Threads
202
Messages
2,587
Reaction score
1,708
Location
mx
Vehicles
none
Country flag
If you scale down you would need all new designs and more machines/tools for front casting, rear casting, structural battery pack. Have to keep inventory of more different parts. Lower economy of scale cost effects.

Possible huge cost saving on factory machines/tools if used Model Y chassis. The problem is Model Y might be too lightweight for a truck.

Model X is another interesting probability. Right now Model X does not have front casting, rear casting, structural battery pack because the current production is too low (50K - 100K) to justify high cost of expensive high volume IRDA gigapress casting machine.

If Cybertruck Wolverine edition was based on a 3rd generation Model X they could share front casting, structural battery pack. Mostly outer body and rear casting would be different.
Also use same platform for minivan.

Model X, Cybertruck Wolverine, minivan
 

JBee

Well-known member
First Name
JB
Joined
Nov 22, 2019
Threads
18
Messages
4,487
Reaction score
1,601
Location
Australia
Vehicles
Tesla
Occupation
. Professional Hobbyist
Country flag
Even the Model 3 and Model Y have changed so much since production started, (castings, structual pack etc) they are not the same car anymore.

Despite that, there's no way to get the MY base to a useful payload without major reworking. They can still use the drivetrain and batteries, HVAC etc on all models anyway, which is half the cost anyway, so they are much better off doing a dedicated Wolverine build. Even GA is laid out to run multiple assembly lines from the same base resources.

As for the design...um yuk. :sick:
It also negates many of the manufacturing benefits of SS exoskeleton for something that looks horrible.

I don't think Tesla or EM will ever do a Lotus/Roadster swap ever again. Learnt the lesson the hard way.
 

Albern

Well-known member
First Name
Alex
Joined
Jan 22, 2020
Threads
6
Messages
282
Reaction score
88
Location
Toronto, Canada
Vehicles
2015 Chevrolet Volt, 202X Cybertruck Plaid+ (x2)
Country flag
I appreciate the effort of the render but I don't like the design. I actually like what someone did for an unofficial Rivian R2S, if Tesla were to work off of the Y for a smaller CT:

Tesla Roadster 2nd gen Wolverine on mod Y basis’ [rendered] rivian-rally-car-rendered-1024x576


Tesla Roadster 2nd gen Wolverine on mod Y basis’ [rendered] Rivian-electric-rally-car
 

charliemagpie

Well-known member
First Name
Charlie
Joined
Jul 6, 2021
Threads
35
Messages
2,635
Reaction score
1,219
Location
Australia
Vehicles
CybrBEAST
Occupation
retired
Country flag
A smaler suburban CT with 2mm SS, could perhaps be more easily shaped as a single shell to create interesting designs.
 

WHIZZARD OF OZ

Well-known member
First Name
Ivan
Joined
Mar 11, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
2,022
Reaction score
281
Location
Australia
Vehicles
VW Up!
Occupation
Electric Wheelchair Builder
Country flag
Well, if you could keep the Y underbody... front and rear castings... Then drop a Cybertruck folded shell over top...

-Crissa
Not even CLOSE....CT is a unique BEAST.
It should remain pure to original intent and execution. Even if this means CT won't land DownUnder.....l will be SAD either way!
 
 
Top