It's less tedious with FSD, which can help prevent the brain from fuzzing out. All those little corrections you need to make use energy and add load to an already tired system.
Well isn't this quite ironic since I just got put on a 7-day time-out (a few weeks ago) from using FSD because I was drowsy too many times while using it. When I needed FSD the most to help me it forbid me from using it for 7-days...
The system is constantly evolving and improving. Before too long, you won't even need to have ANY driver in the driver's seat. As it improves to that point, Tesla's guiding principle for system decisions will always be the one that results in the fewest injuries and deaths.
Actually this is exactly my point… Why not have it suggest you pull over and rest..? …if it detects drowsiness…
I agree with your logic. I guess im more referencing FSD disengaging when it detects driver “not paying attention” and saying “not available the rest of the drive”. Ive never let it go very far to see if it would actually pull the car over but i wonder if it would.
No, it won't. See my post above:
It just turns off and leaves you to your own devices...Well isn't this quite ironic since I just got put on a 7-day time-out (a few weeks ago) from using FSD because I was drowsy too many times while using it. When I needed FSD the most to help me it forbid me from using it for 7-days...
Ah. So this confirms my concern as listed above. I understand how it can reduce task saturation, but at the same time if FSD disengages for this reason, the driver is asleep and the car crashes… well then at least they can say it wasn't fsd’s fault? Idk, the messaging above seems kind of misleading. I dont think that engaging FSD would help the driver stay focused under these circumstances.
