- First Name
- Carlos
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2021
- Threads
- 11
- Messages
- 1,126
- Reaction score
- 781
- Location
- Peoria, AZ
- Vehicles
- Rivian R1T, Zero SR/S, Smart
- Occupation
- Geek
- Banned
- #16
I posted this on another forum. I double checked my math, pretty sure I got it right. So ridiculously inefficient.
Now, it looks good, I'll give you that. I found myself thinking, well, don't be a bigot, go test drive one. I start looking, and... Sigh. So GM. So stupid. It has the lowest efficiency of any EV. By far.
47 MPGe (gas equivalent). The Rivian and CT are in the 70-74 range. This means it uses over 700 watt-hours to go a mile. Most e-cars are around 250. Obviously, this is much larger. The other pickups are in the 480 range. So even at my super low rates it costs 3.6 cents/mile instead of the 1.5 I pay now. Damn. The CT would be at 2.5, still quite a bit more than the car. Hmm.
It weighs 9063 pounds. Lots of extra battery to make up for the extremely low efficiency. So now, we have to charge even longer. Am I missing anything on why anyone would buy this thing?
I do like the look a lot though.
Now, it looks good, I'll give you that. I found myself thinking, well, don't be a bigot, go test drive one. I start looking, and... Sigh. So GM. So stupid. It has the lowest efficiency of any EV. By far.
47 MPGe (gas equivalent). The Rivian and CT are in the 70-74 range. This means it uses over 700 watt-hours to go a mile. Most e-cars are around 250. Obviously, this is much larger. The other pickups are in the 480 range. So even at my super low rates it costs 3.6 cents/mile instead of the 1.5 I pay now. Damn. The CT would be at 2.5, still quite a bit more than the car. Hmm.
It weighs 9063 pounds. Lots of extra battery to make up for the extremely low efficiency. So now, we have to charge even longer. Am I missing anything on why anyone would buy this thing?
I do like the look a lot though.