CTOWannabe
Well-known member
- First Name
- CTO
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2024
- Threads
- 9
- Messages
- 143
- Reaction score
- 85
- Location
- US
- Vehicles
- 2025 Cybertruck AWD
- Thread starter
- #1
I had a deposit down before the reveal (now turned performance reservation). I quickly put down a Thrust deposit after the show.
But after the euphoria of that AMAZING reveal, I, just today, cancelled my Thrust reservation and am thinking about cancelling my Performance reservation and thinking the base standard roadster may be the one to get.
So why I nixed the rocket/thruster models. They are hella cool, but just not realistically something I would ever use on road or track. The thrusters make a coal-roll like plume that I just can't see subjecting others to on the road. It's totally rad, and if you're a drag strip guy, totally makes sense. But I'm not. Even on track, it seems discourteous to plume the track using it. Also, with no frunk, the luggage space in back seems really useful to us for road trips.
But now I'm thinking about the performance model. It has a fan system that has 2 parts to it. A Brabham BT46/McMurtry Sperirling vacuum cleaner style fan, and a low pressure GMA T.50 style fan all in one. I can't see ever using the vacuum style fan, even on track, as it will eject huge amounts of dust and rock chips on others, and even on track, that seems pretty disrespectful. Maybe it's useful on the drag strip for helping on launch, but not my use case.
The T50 style low pressure helps for some downforce thats usable on the road and for high speed runs creating long tails. I'd like it if it were a separate option even though Id use it rarely, but it comes together with the movable skirt mechanism and vacuum mechanism, which adds weight, complexity, and extra things to maintain.
So I'm starting to think maybe the base is the way to go. If I"m understanding the base has no fan system, and has a little less HP, but likely has less weight. So am I crazy in thinking the base is "the one" to get?
Curious how all you others are thinking about which model to get?
So a few stats Ive collected so far:
(1) Tesla gave range and charging for the car in general.
(2) There might be frunk space too.
(3) It isn't clear what "Limited FSD" means. After the reveal, Musk posted that you will be able to ask the Roadster to perform the tricks shown autonomously, and that Tesla will have a looping test track at its Texas HQ for owners.
(4) 214 mph is from Tesla staff via Top Gear and 210 mph is from Hagerty; a 330 mph gearing version is planned.
(5) From Top Gear's narration, not confirmed by Tesla.
(6) US amounts shown; refundable until you configure. UK, Canadian, EU and Indian amounts differ (India: about ₹50 lakh for Performance and ₹2.5 crore for Thrust).
(7) Musk's "not necessarily a safety-optimized car" quote plus the McLaren and Koenigsegg track-only mode precedent.
(8) Tesla's site says "Not approved for public road use," set against Musk's reveal quotes and DeSantis's post. The FAA says "The Tesla vehicle does not meet the FAA's definition of an aircraft," and the Transportation Department says NHTSA "will continue to monitor the situation."
(9) After the reveal, Musk posted a goal of over Mach 0.5, about 400 mph peak speed. This is a stated goal, not a spec.
But after the euphoria of that AMAZING reveal, I, just today, cancelled my Thrust reservation and am thinking about cancelling my Performance reservation and thinking the base standard roadster may be the one to get.
So why I nixed the rocket/thruster models. They are hella cool, but just not realistically something I would ever use on road or track. The thrusters make a coal-roll like plume that I just can't see subjecting others to on the road. It's totally rad, and if you're a drag strip guy, totally makes sense. But I'm not. Even on track, it seems discourteous to plume the track using it. Also, with no frunk, the luggage space in back seems really useful to us for road trips.
But now I'm thinking about the performance model. It has a fan system that has 2 parts to it. A Brabham BT46/McMurtry Sperirling vacuum cleaner style fan, and a low pressure GMA T.50 style fan all in one. I can't see ever using the vacuum style fan, even on track, as it will eject huge amounts of dust and rock chips on others, and even on track, that seems pretty disrespectful. Maybe it's useful on the drag strip for helping on launch, but not my use case.
The T50 style low pressure helps for some downforce thats usable on the road and for high speed runs creating long tails. I'd like it if it were a separate option even though Id use it rarely, but it comes together with the movable skirt mechanism and vacuum mechanism, which adds weight, complexity, and extra things to maintain.
So I'm starting to think maybe the base is the way to go. If I"m understanding the base has no fan system, and has a little less HP, but likely has less weight. So am I crazy in thinking the base is "the one" to get?
Curious how all you others are thinking about which model to get?
So a few stats Ive collected so far:
| Base | Performance | Thrust | Rocket | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Production | Apparently regular unlimited production; announced, not reservable | Apparently regular unlimited production; reservable | Limited release; reservable (not available in all regions) | Invite only (not available in all regions) |
| Deposit (6) | — | $50k ($5k now + $45k within 10 days) | $250k ($5k now + $245k within 10 days); one per customer | Invite only |
| Cost | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD |
| Seats | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Power | ~1,340 hp (5) | 1,500 hp | 1,500 hp | 1,500 hp |
| Torque | ~960 lb-ft (5) | 1,033 lb-ft | Same | Same |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | RWD | RWD |
| FSD | Limited FSD mentioned (3) | Limited FSD mentioned (3) | Limited FSD mentioned (3) | Limited FSD mentioned (3) |
| 0–60 mph | Not stated | Under 1.6 s | 0.85 s (Tesla: under 0.9 s) | Under 0.59 s |
| Top speed | ~210–214 mph (4) | ~210–214 mph (4) | 230 mph (9) | Over 230 mph (9) |
| Thruster nozzles | 0 | 0 | 4 | 10 |
| Fan suction | Likely none | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Rear luggage room (2) | Yes | Yes | No, the tank takes the space | No |
| Range | 310–320 mi (1) | 310–320 mi (1) | 310–320 mi (1) | 310–320 mi (1) |
| Weight | Under 1,700 kg (~3,750 lb) target | ~1,700 kg | Heavier, amount not stated | Heavier, amount not stated |
| Battery charging | 15→85% in 10 min, over 500 kW (1) | Same (1) | Same (1) | Same (1) |
| Air tank refill | No tank | No tank | 200 L: 2–6 h now, goal under 30 min | 600 L: ~6–7 h now, goal ~1 h |
| Road legal (7) | Yes | Yes | Likely road legal with feature limitations (8) | Likely road legal with feature limitations (8) |
(1) Tesla gave range and charging for the car in general.
(2) There might be frunk space too.
(3) It isn't clear what "Limited FSD" means. After the reveal, Musk posted that you will be able to ask the Roadster to perform the tricks shown autonomously, and that Tesla will have a looping test track at its Texas HQ for owners.
(4) 214 mph is from Tesla staff via Top Gear and 210 mph is from Hagerty; a 330 mph gearing version is planned.
(5) From Top Gear's narration, not confirmed by Tesla.
(6) US amounts shown; refundable until you configure. UK, Canadian, EU and Indian amounts differ (India: about ₹50 lakh for Performance and ₹2.5 crore for Thrust).
(7) Musk's "not necessarily a safety-optimized car" quote plus the McLaren and Koenigsegg track-only mode precedent.
(8) Tesla's site says "Not approved for public road use," set against Musk's reveal quotes and DeSantis's post. The FAA says "The Tesla vehicle does not meet the FAA's definition of an aircraft," and the Transportation Department says NHTSA "will continue to monitor the situation."
(9) After the reveal, Musk posted a goal of over Mach 0.5, about 400 mph peak speed. This is a stated goal, not a spec.
Last edited: